Flagship course

Transaction Monitoring Audit Lab

A six-week live program that turns monitoring analysts into authors of audit-ready evidence — sampling, logic challenge, and findings that hold under second-line scrutiny.

Professional reviewing documents in an office

Outcomes

What you will leave able to do

  • Design a risk-weighted sample plan for wallet, remittance, or card flows
  • Document threshold and rule changes with chronology that auditors can follow
  • Write exception narratives that separate data gaps from true control failures
  • Defend findings in a mock second-line panel using committee-ready language
  • Track remediation owners and due dates without losing the original finding trail
  • Map Korea-facing supervisory questions to your existing workpaper set

Modules

Six weeks, one artifact each week

Week 1 — Scope the monitoring universe

Inventory products, channels, and alert types; define what is in and out of the audit sample frame.

Week 2 — Threshold chronology

Rebuild the story of rule edits, temporary overrides, and approval trails using our chronology sheet.

Week 3 — Sampling that matches risk

Strata design for corridors and channels; avoid the “random 25” habit that misses concentrated risk.

Week 4 — Alert logic challenge

Walk through false-positive drivers and tune documentation so logic changes are explainable later.

Week 5 — Findings and management response

Draft findings with severity criteria and draft management responses that commit to measurable fixes.

Week 6 — Mock panel & board language

Present to a peer second-line panel; refine slides and spoken answers for directors.

Instructor

Who facilitates the Lab

Portrait of instructor Eunji Han

Eunji Han

Former second-line monitoring reviewer for a Korea-licensed payments firm, Eunji has led fieldwork preparation for remittance and wallet audits since 2016. She designs Dataanalyticscloud scenario packs and runs the mock panels.

Informational fee reference: Cohort Seat at ₩1.85M per person. See pricing for Team Desk options. No checkout on this site.

Reviews

From recent Lab cohorts

The Week 5 finding draft I brought in was too polite. The panel made me sharpen the root cause — and that version is what we filed.

Yuri A., AML analyst

Evenings are long after a full workday. I would not call it light. The worksheets, though, replaced three inconsistent templates we had been juggling.

Daeho · Incheon

FAQ

Before you enroll

Do I need a specific monitoring vendor?

No. Exercises use vendor-neutral screenshots and CSV extracts. You adapt patterns to your platform.

Is this legal advice or a certified audit?

Neither. It is professional training. Your firm remains responsible for regulatory obligations and formal audit opinions.

What is a real limitation of the Lab?

We do not ingest your production data or configure live rules. If you need system-side tuning, you will still need your technology partners. The Lab improves documentation and challenge quality around whatever system you already run.

Language of instruction?

English materials and facilitation, with Korean examples and supervisory references where relevant.

Reserve interest for the next Seoul evening stream

Tell us your role and target audit window — we will confirm cohort dates by email.